Welcome to the Journal of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Manuscript Guidelines

The journal has specific rules to formatting a manuscript that authors should adhere to before shipping their manuscript. These guidelines are primarily intended to make the submission of manuscript quick and easy.    Read More

click here

Ethics & Disclosures

Journal of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis is primarily based on values centered on loyalty, commitment, scientific accuracy, and ethics. It has adopted clear and rigorous ethical guidelines for best working practices.    Read More

What happens next to your Submission

Each article we publish benefits from hundreds of hours of work by Chief editors, Sectional editors, Reviewers, Manuscript editors, Proofreaders, Graphics and Web experts, who work to ensure that the manuscript meets our standards.    Read More


Focus & Scope

Journal of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis is an International peer reviewed open access journal which is praised as the source for most up to date information related to cancer research & treatment including oncology, diagnosis and prevention of cancer.

The prior aim of the journal is to eradicate cancer from human population by providing sufficient information to the doctors about the rapid changes occurring in the field of cancer research& treatment in the form of comprehensive review articles on cancer topics and current issues that are related to cancer care.

Read more


Stay in the loop with our newsletter!

Recent Articles

Vol 2-4 Mini Review

Bridging the Data Gap in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment to Enable Widespread Clinical Implementation across the Multiethnic Landscape of the US

Erika Spaeth1, Athena Starlard-Davenport2, Richard Allman3

1Phenogen Sciences Inc, Charlotte, NC 28269, USA

2Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

3Genetic Technologies, Ltd, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death among women and is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. Breast cancer risk assessment has been clinically available for nearly 30 years yet is under-utilized in practice for multiple reasons. Incorporation of polygenic risk as well as breast density measurements, promise to increase the accuracy of risk assessment. With that comes the hope that both prevention and screening become more personalized and thus more effective. Incidence rates have been static over the past 15 years and have even increased slightly in African American and Asian/Pacific Islander populations despite the robust data on breast cancer risk reduction measures that exist. Current challenges in reducing breast cancer incidence begin with robust data curation that allows for appropriate risk stratification across our multiethnic population and conclude with the implementation of prevention strategies within our fractured healthcare system.

Read More
Vol 2-4 Mini Review

Management of Loco-Regional Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-The Role of Induction Chemotherapy-A Mini-Review

Frank E Mott1*, Ruth L. Sacks2

1Thoracic and Head/Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA

2University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA

Standard treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is patterned after the Intergroup 0099 trial with concurrent cisplatin with radiotherapy, followed by consolidation chemotherapy. This remains the guideline recommended standard. With the wider use of intensity modulated radiotherapy and the incorporation of taxanes in the chemotherapy regimen, many oncologists are increasingly using an induction approach with chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Induction chemotherapy is not considered a standard approach despite studies showing efficacy and tolerability. In this mini-review, we summarize the data from trials and reviews of induction therapy and argue for its recognition as a viable standard option for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Read More
Vol 2-4 Mini Review

Mini Review: Immunohistochemistry Using EGFR-Mutant Specific Antibodies in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Accuracy and Reliability

Rania Gaber1,2,3, Torsten Goldmann1,3*

1Pathology of the University of Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Site Borstel, Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Borstel, Germany

2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexaandria, Egypt

3Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Germany

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a predictive biomarker in many solid cancers including non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Patients’ responsiveness to therapy is based on the prior determination of EGFR status. Many techniques were used to detect the potential predictive biomarker and considered as gold standards based on molecular genetic techniques as direct sequencing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using EGFR mutation-specific antibodies were generated as an alternative simple tool to identify EGFR status and its response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR gene copy number and wild-type EGFR are other parameters which determine the response to TKIs. The aim of this mini-review is to analyze the studies which investigated the IHC EGFR mutation-specific antibodies, in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), to determine its accuracy and reliability as a pre-selection tool for candidate patients for TKIs therapy as well as the interplay with other EGFR biomarkers which are EGFR gene copy number and the wild-type EGFR in lung NSCLC. The later determine the response to TKIs and their detection methodology is standardized making them good candidates for comparison with the EGFR-mutation.

Read More
Vol 2-4 Commentary

Value of Multiplatform Molecular Profiling (MMP) of Tumors in Clinical Practice

Ofer Purim1*, Aron Popovtzer2, Ron Epelbaum3

1Oncology Institute, Assuta Ashdod Academic Hospital, Ashdod, Israel

2Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

3Department of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

In the last 20 years, cancer treatment has witnessed a paradigm shift with the advent of modern targeted therapies. Still, at present, targeted therapies, despite being very effective, are only relevant for a minority of patients, whereas the majority of patients are still being offered cytotoxic drugs. The goal of this mini-review is to describe the clinical utility of tumor multi-panel molecular profiling (MMP) to guide treatment decisions (primarily chemotherapies but also targeted therapies) in patients with solid tumors and the evidence supporting this approach, focusing on the Caris Molecular Intelligence (CMI) MMP. The evidence suggests that MMP is a practical, implementable tool that can be used to personalize treatment (including that of chemotherapies), increasing the likelihood of response and sparing patients from unnecessary toxicity associated with ineffective therapies. MMP provides the ability to offer therapy to patients in later lines, particularly for those who have already failed multiple lines of therapy and exhausted the standard therapy options (by suggesting therapies which may be used off-label). Furthermore, the evidence indicates that MMP-guided therapy favorably impacts both progression-free survival and overall survival. As the current data consist of mainly retrospective studies, prospective trials are warranted to strengthen the evidence.

Read More
Click here for more articles

Special Features to Authors

Editing Services

We offer editing services to help you prepare a submission-ready manuscript.
Learn more

Article Outreach

The journal works hard to maximize the impact of published research.
Learn more


JCCS offers a professional quality Reprint Service that enables users to have reprints delivered to their door at an affordable value.
Learn more